The contempt application stood disposed of as the impugned order of the writ Court had been complied with, rendering the application infructuous. No substantive legal proposition was laid down.
Contempt application and notice disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:175676
Court No. - 9
Case :- CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 2632 of 2023
Applicant :- Dinesh Singh Opposite Party :- Sri Anil Dhingra,M.D. U.P. Jal Nigam (Urban) And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Sadhu Sharan Counsel for Opposite Party :- Vimlesh Kumar Rai
Hon'ble Rohit Ranjan Agarwal,J.
Sri Sadhu Sharan, learned counsel for the applicant and Sri Vimlesh Kumar Rai, learned counsel for the opposite party states that the order of the writ Court has been complied with.
In view of the statement so made by both the counsels for the parties, the contempt application has rendered infructuous and stands disposed of.
Contempt notice stands disposed of.
Order Date :- 6.9.2023 Kushal
Digitally signed by :- KUSHAL AGRAWAL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Dinesh Singh
Rohit Ranjan Agarwal
Kushal AgRAWAL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
