Contempt application filed in 2017 was dismissed for want of prosecution as no counsel appeared to press the petition and no adjournment was sought.
Contempt petition dismissed for want of prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC-LKO:70993
Court No. - 4
Case :- CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 2584 of 2017
Applicant :- M/S Kumar Tent House Thru. Prop. Mr. Harish Kumar Masand
Opposite Party :- A.K. Upadhayay Addl. Commissioner Sib Commercial Tax Deptt.
Counsel for Applicant :- Mukteshwar Mishra
Hon'ble Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J.
1. This contempt petition is of the year 2017.
2. Case called out.
3. None appeared on behalf of the petitioner to press this contempt petition nor any request for adjournment of the case has been sought.
4. Accordingly, the instant contempt petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
5. Notices, if any, stand discharged.
[Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J.]
Order Date :- 30.10.2023 Suresh/
Digitally signed by :- SURESH CHANDRA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
M/S Kumar Tent House Thru. Prop. Mr. Harish Kumar Masand
Rajesh Singh Chauhan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
