A contempt petition filed in 2017 was dismissed for want of prosecution as no representative of the applicant appeared to press the petition, and no adjournment was sought. The notice was subsequently discharged.
Contempt petition dismissed for want of prosecution; notice discharged.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC-LKO:69491
Court No. - 4
Case :- CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 2082 of 2017
Applicant :- Dinesh Kumar Shukla Opposite Party :- Mr. Amar Nath Verma Director Of Educationsecondary And Anr.
Counsel for Applicant :- Alok Kumar Tripathi
Hon'ble Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J.
[Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J.]
Order Date :- 19.10.2023 kkv/
Digitally signed by :- KRISHAN KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Dinesh Kumar Shukla
Mr. Amar Nath Verma
Rajesh Singh Chauhan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
