Criminal appeal for want of prosecution dismissed as the appellant was absent and no appearance was put in on behalf of the appellant and the opposite party.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 84
Case :- CRIMINAL APPEAL U/S 372 CR.P.C. No. - 6660 of 2010
Appellant :- Vinod Kumar Sharma Respondent :- State of U.P. and Others Counsel for Appellant :- Ashutosh Yadav Counsel for Respondent :- Govt. Advocate,Rahul Singh Dahiya
Hon'ble Mrs. Sadhna Rani (Thakur),J.
No one has put in appearance on behalf of the appellant. On the last date also on 27.07.2023, no one was present on behalf of the appellant. Learned counsel for the opposite party nos. 2 and 3 is present.
Criminal appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Order Date :- 22.8.2023 T.S.
Digitally signed by :- TRIBHUWAN SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Vinod Kumar Sharma
State of U.P.
Sadhna Rani (Thakur)
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
