This is an order dismissing a bail cancellation application filed by a victim regarding a minor under POCSO Act. The court found no grounds to interfere with the bail granted by the lower court as the accused was cooperating and no misuse of liberty was alleged.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:165207
Reserved On:- 07.08.2023 Delivered On:- 17.08.2023
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL CANCELLATION APPLICATION No. - 563 of 2022
Applicant :- Victim Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Ajit Kumar Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Vivek Kumar Singh
Hon'ble Siddharth, J.
2
of the opposite party no. 2 was got dismissed as not pressed but his second bail application was allowed by the court below on 15.06.2022. Thereafter statement of the victim was recorded under section 164 Cr.P.C., wherein she made clear allegation against the opposite party no. 2. The findings recorded while granting bail to the opposite party no. 2 are against the correct facts on record. It has been prayed that the bail granted to the opposite party no. 2 may be cancelled.
3
Order Date :- 17.08.2023 Rohit
Digitally signed by :- ROHIT DAS High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Victim (Applicant)
State of U.P.
Opposite Party No. 2
Siddharth
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
