Allowed

Virpal Singh v. State of U.P. and Another

Allahabad HC20 Sept 2023BAILC/543/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Single judge order quashing bail cancellation application on procedural grounds, holding that spontaneous inquiry is mandatory for prima facie offenses under Section 437 CrPC and the new law allows maintaining anticipatory bail applications.

What did the court decide?

Cancelling order of bail cancellation and restoring original bail. Mandatory direction to conduct spontaneous inquiry for future such applications.

Virpal Singh Vs State of U.P. and Another — Bail and Remand | Allahabad HC (2023)

¶1

Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:182299

¶2

Court No. - 68

¶3

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL CANCELLATION APPLICATION No. - 543 of 2022

¶4

Applicant :- Virpal Singh Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Kamlesh Kumar Dwivedi Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Raghvendra Kumar Mishra

¶5

Hon'ble Dr. Gautam Chowdhary,J.

¶6

lwph iqujhf{krA

¶7

vkosnd dh vksj ls dksbZ mifLFkr ugha gSA

¶8

orZeku nkf.Md izdh.kZ tekur fujLrhdj.k izkFkZuk i=] oknh@izFkelwpukdrkZ ohjiky flag dh vksj ls eq0v0la0 182 lu 2022] vUrxZr /kkjk 302] 201] 202] 120&ch Hkk0na0fo0] Fkkuk [kUnkSyh] ftyk vkxjk esa vfHk;qDr@foi{kh la0 2 eqds’k rksej dh tekur fujLr djus gsrq izLrqr fd;k x;k gSA

¶9

fo}ku vij 'kkldh; vf/koDrk dks lquk rFkk i=koyh dk ifj’khyu fd;kA

¶10

;g tekur fujLrhdj.k vkosnu i= vkosnd@izFkelwpukdrkZ dh vksj ls bl vk’k; ls izLrqr fd;k x;k gS fd foi{kh la0 2 dks tekur] tekur vkns’k eas fufgr 'krksZ ds v/khu nh x;h Fkh fdUrq foi{kh la0 2@vfHk;qDr us tekur vkns’k esa fufgr 'krksZ dk mYya?ku fd;k gS] mlds }kjk oknh ,oa mlds xokgksa dks Mjk;k&/kedk;k tk jgk gS] bl laca/k esa izFkelwpukdrkZ }kjk iqfyl@iz’kklfud vf/kdkfj;ksa ds le{k vkosnu i= Hkh izLrqr fd;k x;k gSA

¶11

fo}ku vij 'kkldh; vf/koDrk dk dFku gS fd izFkelwpukdrkZ@oknh ds ikl lk{kh laj{k.k Ldhe] 2018 ds rgr ;g mik; miyC/k gS vkSj mlds }kjk tekur fujLrhdj.k vkosnu i= izLrqr djus ds ctk; lk{kh laj{k.k Ldhe] 2018 ds rgr izFkelwpukdrkZ@xokgksa dks miyC/k djk;h x;h lqj{kk ds izdk’k esa bl tekur fujLrhdj.k vkosnu i= dk fuLrkj.k fd;k tk ldrk gSA

¶12

fo}ku vij 'kkldh; vf/koDrk ds rdksZ ds n`f"Vxr] bl U;k;ky; dk er gS fd pwWfd oknh@izFkelwpukdrkZ ds ikl lk{kh laj{k.k Ldhe] 2018 ds rgr lqj{kk izkIr djus dk volj miyC/k gS] ftls ekuuh; mPpre U;k;ky; us Mahender Chawla and others Vs. Union of India reported in (2019) 14 SCC 615 esa eatwnh ns nh gSA

¶13

rn~uqlkj] ;g tekur fujLrhdj.k vkosnu i= bl leqfDr ds lkFk vfUre :i ls fuLrkfjr fd;k tkrk gS fd ;fn oknh@izFkelwpukdrkZ bl vkns’k dh izekf.kr izfrfyfi ds lkFk viuh f’kdk;rksa ds fuokj.k ds fy, lk{kh laj{k.k Ldhe] 2018 esa fu/kkZfjr izk:i esa l{ke izkf/kdkjh ds le{k vkosnu i= izLrqr djrk gS] rks lk{kh laj{k.k Ldhe] 2018 dh /kkjk 2(c) ds rgr ,d lIrkg ds vUnj l{ke izkf/kdkjh }kjk rRdky oknh@izFkelwpukdrkZ ds vkosnu i= ij fopkj fd;k tk,xk ,oa ml ij ;Fkk’kh/kz@;FkklaHko 1 ekg ds vUnj fof/kd fu.kZ; fy;k tk,xkA

¶14

rn~uqlkj ;g tekur fujLrhdj.k vkosnu i= vfUre :i ls fuLrkfjr fd;k tkrk gSA fn0 % 20&9&2023 ds0lh0flag

¶15

Digitally signed by :- KAILASH CHANDRA SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Virpal Singh v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Virpal Singh v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Hasnain Hasan Vs State of U.P.

Rajmala Vs State of U.P.

Dileep Vs State of U.P.

Ram Gopal Vs State of U.P.

Lavkush Vs State of U.P and Another

Gufran Hashmi Vs State of U.P.