Shani @ Sannu v. State of U.P. and 3 Others
Case brief
What is this about?
Application for bail under Section 437 CrPC. Applicant claims prolonged incarceration violates Article 21, denies tampering with evidence, and highlights pending investigation.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 79
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 9859 of 2023
Applicant :- Shani @ Sannu Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Applicant :- Sanjay Kumar Yadav Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Dr. Gautam Chowdhary,J.
आववेदक कका यह दቛኌततीय जमकानत आववेदन प्ቔ हह , आववेदक कका ्ቚथम जमकानत, जमकानत आववेदन प्ቔ ससं० 7156/2020 मम इस न्यकायकालय ककी अन्य न्यकायपतीठ ቛኌकारका दद० 01.12.2020 कको र्ቌ दकयका गयका हह।
वतरमकानदकाणणणक्ቚ ककीररजमकानत्ቚ काथरनकाप्ቔ आववेदक सनतीउररसनन ककीओरसवेमम०अ०स० 208/2019, अन्तगरतधकारका 376 भका०दसं०दव०एवसंधकारका 5/6 पपकसकोएकट, थकानकाब व ेर, जजलकामहनपमरतीममजमकानतपरममक करनवेहवेतम्ቚ सतमतदकयकागयकाहह।
आववेदककवेदवቛኌकानअजधवककाएवसंदवቛኌकानअपरशकासककीयअजधवककाककोसमनकातथकाप्ቔकावलतीककापररशतीलन दकयका।
आववेदककवेदवቛኌकानअजधवककानवेतकर्ቚ सतमतदकयकादकआववेदकककोइस्ቚ कररममगलतएवसंरजरढसंगसवेझनठका रसंसकायकागयकाहह, उसनवेकजथतअपरकाधककाररतनहहदकयकाहह।्ቚ थमसनचनकाररपकोटरदवलसंदबतहह, जजसककाककोई सपषतीकररनहहददयकागयकाहह।आववेदकቛኌकारकाकजथतपतीदडतकाकवेसकाथदमरकाचकारनहहदकयकागयका।तथकाकजथत घटनकाककाककोईसवतसं्ቔ सकाकतीनहहहह।आववेदकएकदनदरषवयदकहहऔरउसवेवतरमकानमकामलवेममजसररउतपतीडन कवेजलएझनठकारसंसकायकागयकाहह।आववेदकइस्ቚ कररममदद० 28.05.2019 सवेककारकागकारममदनरदहहतथकाइस वकादसवेससंबसंजधतस्ቔ परतीकरकवेदनसतकाररककीशतीघससंभकावनकानजरनहहआरहतीहह।इसजलएआववेदककको जमकानतपरछकोडददयकाजकाय।आववेदककवेदवቛኌकानअजधवककानवेअपनवेतकरकवेसमथरन I ndrani Pratim Mukerjea Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and another passed in Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No. 1627 of 2022 to submit that prolonged incarceration of a person as an under trial is against his fundamental rights under Article 21 of the Constitution of India. मममकाननतीयउचचतमन्यकायकालयቛኌकारका्ቚ दतपकाददतदवजध-वयवसथकाककीओरन्यकायकालय ककाधयकानआककषदकयका।
Issues for consideration
3 issues framed by the court
Whether the applicant is eligible for bail considering prolonged incarceration and allegations of tampering with evidence.
Whether the applicant has interfered with the investigation or caused harm to the investigation.
Whether the applicant can be released on bail despite pending investigation and threat of testimony in court.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Shani @ Sannu
- respondent
State Of U.P.
Coram
Dr. Gautam Chowdhary
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · March
- Registered
- Case no.
- BAIL/9859/2023
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court