None appeared to press the bail application. The court observed the applicant was not interested and dismissed the application for want of prosecution.
None
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 77
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 9569 of 2022
Applicant :- Golu Gautam Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And 3 Other Counsel for Applicant :- Savan Kumar,Anil Kumar,Jai Prakash Prasad,Kunwar Mayank Singh,Satish Sharma,Shiv Kumar Yadav,Sudhanshu Kumar Mishra Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Jai Singh Yadav
Hon'ble Raj Beer Singh,J.
None appeared on behalf of applicant. On previous date also none appeared on behalf of applicant to press this bail application.
Learned counsel for informant is present.
It appears that applicant is not interested in pursuing this bail application.
In view of aforesaid, this bail application is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Order Date :- 26.5.2023 Imtiyaz
Digitally signed by :- IMTIYAZ AHMAD High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Golu Gautam
State Of U.P.
Golu Gautam
Raj Beer Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
