Dismissed
Pankaj v. State of U.P.
Allahabad HCBAIL/9420/2022
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
The Allahabad High Court dismissed a third bail application as the trial had concluded, rendering the application infructuous.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:201756
¶2
Court No. - 69
¶3
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 9420 of 2022
¶4
Applicant :- Pankaj Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Sandeep Mishra Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
¶5
Hon'ble Samit Gopal,J.
¶6
- List revised.
¶7
- Heard Sri Sandeep Mishra, learned counsel for the applicant and Sri Triveni Saran Rai, learned counsel for the State.
¶8
- This is a third bail application. The first two bail applications on behalf of the applicant were rejected by this Court vide orders dated 29.7.2020 and 9.9.2021 passed in Criminal Misc. Bail Application Nos.13842 of 2020 and 26700 of 2021.
¶9
- Learned counsel for the applicant states that the present bail application has become infructuous as the trial has concluded.
¶10
- As prayed by learned counsel for the applicant, the present bail application is dismissed as having become infructuous.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
AI extract
Whether the present bail application has become infructuous as the trial has concluded.
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- applicant
Pankaj
Coram
AI extract
Samit Gopal
Gaurav Kuls
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · October
- Registered
- Case no.
- BAIL/9420/2022
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court