Dismissed
Suraj @ Subedar v. State of U.P.
Allahabad HCBAIL/8895/2021
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Bail application dismissed because the applicant failed to appear for the rehearing despite a revised listing.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:145213
¶2
Court No. - 64
¶3
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 8895 of 2021
¶4
Applicant :- Suraj @ Subedar Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Priyanshu Kumar Srivastava,Hemant Kumar Srivastava Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
¶5
Hon'ble Siddharth,J.
¶6
- List revised.
¶7
- This case is listed peremptorily today.
¶8
- No one responds on behalf of the applicant, like on earlier date fixed.
¶9
- It is not known whether the trial has been concluded or not. Whether the applicant has been charge-sheeted or exonerated.
¶10
- This bail application, is accordingly, dismissed for want of prosecution.
¶11
Order Date :- 20.7.2023 Abhishek
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- applicant
Suraj @ Subedar
Coram
AI extract
Siddharth
Abhishek
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · July
- Registered
- Case no.
- BAIL/8895/2021
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court