Islam v. State of U.P.
Case brief
What is this about?
Single judge dismissed bail application of applicant Islam, who faced charges under U.P. Gangsters Act, citing his extensive criminal history including theft, loot, and murder implications, finding him not a fit case for release.
What did the court decide?
Bail application rejected. Directed trial court to conclude trial within six months.
What the court decided
1
Reserved On:- 04.04.2023 Delivered On:- 07.04.2023
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 8633 of 2023 Applicant :- Islam
Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Satendra Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Siddharth, J.
- Heard learned counsel for the applicant and the learned A.G.A for the State.
- The instant bail application has been filed on behalf of the applicant, Islam, with a prayer to release him on bail in Case Crime No. 558 of 2022, under Section 2/3 of U.P. Gangsters and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, Police Station- Roravar, District- Aligarh, pendency of trial.
- The applicant has been implicated under section 2/3 of U.P. Gangsters and Anti-social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986. There are 3 cases shown against the applicant in the gangchart as follows:-
- Case crime No. 257 of 2022, under sections- 392 and 411 IPC, Police Station- Rorawar, District Aligarh;
- Case Crime No. 316 of 2022, under Sections- 379 and 411 IPC, Police Station- Rorawar, District Aligarh; and
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the applicant should be enlarged on bail given his criminal history under the Gangsters Act.
Whether the applicant is a fit case for granting bail at the current stage.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Islam
- respondent
State of U.P.
Coram
Siddharth
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · April
- Registered
- Case no.
- BAIL/8633/2023
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court