Farukh v. State of U.P.
Case brief
What is this about?
The court held that the bail application was infructuous because the applicant had already undergone the sentence awarded by the trial court and was released from jail. The application was dismissed.
What did the court decide?
The bail application was dismissed as it was found to be infructuous.
What the court decided
Court No. - 74
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 7406 of 2017
Applicant :- Farukh Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Irshad Husain,Adya Prasad Tewari,Ankur Tondon,Ravi Shankar Tripathi Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Ajay Bhanot,J.
In compliance of the order dated 25.1.2023, Secretary, District Legal Services Authority, Budaun is present in court. He has disclosed the cause for failure to send the report on the date fixed.
The report send by the learned District Judge, Budaun regarding the status of trial records that the applicant has been released from District Jail, Budaun on 05.10.2017 after undergoing the sentence awarded by the trial court.
The bail application is infructuous.
The bail application is accordingly dismissed.
Order Date :- 28.1.2023 Kirti
Digitally signed by :- KIRTI SAHU High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the bail application remains maintainable after the applicant has undergone the sentence awarded by the trial court.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Farukh
Coram
Ajay Bhanot
Kirti Sahu
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · January
- Registered
- Case no.
- BAIL/7406/2017
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court