Allowed

Manoj @ Kala v. State of U.P. and 3 Others

Allahabad HC9 Oct 2023BAIL/6601/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This single-judge High Court bail application allowed the applicant by remanding him to custody pending trial on grounds of fair trial assurance and lack of在具体 special circumstances against arrest, overriding specific defense arguments regarding age and disability.

What did the court decide?

Remanded the applicant to custody pending trial and issued a future non-bailable warrant.

Manoj @ Kala Vs State of U.P. and 3 Others — Bail and Remand | Allahabad HC (2023)

¶1

Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:194306

¶2

Court No. - 68

¶3

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 6601 of 2023

¶4

Applicant :- Manoj @ Kala Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Applicant :- Devendra Kumar Mishra Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶5

Hon'ble Dr. Gautam Chowdhary,J.

¶6

orZeku nkf.Md izdh.kZ tekur izkFkZuk i=] vkosnd eukst mQZ dkyk dh vksj ls eq0v0la0 543 lu 2022] vUrxZr /kkjk 376 Mh-,-] 323 Hkk0na0fo0 ,oa 5@6 ikDlks ,sDV] Fkkuk Tronika City] ftyk xkft;kckn esa tekur ij eqDr djus gsrq izLrqr fd;k x;k gSA

¶7

vkosnd ds fo}ku vf/koDrk ,oa fo}ku vij 'kkldh; vf/koDrk dks lquk rFkk i=koyh dk ifj’khyu fd;kA

¶8

vkosnd ds fo}ku vf/koDrk dk dFku gS fd vkosnd dks bl izdj.k esa xyr ,oa QthZ rjhds ls >wBk QWlk;k x;k gS] mlus dfFkr vijk/k dkfjr ugha fd;k gS] ?kVuk dh izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ vKkr ds fo:) ntZ djk;h x;h gS] okfnuh }kjk ftu vKkr O;fDr;ksa }kjk ?kVuk dkfjr djuk crk;k x;k gS] izkFkfedh esa mudh mez 30&35 o"kZ vafdr djk;h x;h gS tcfd vkosnd dh vk;q djhc 42 o"kZ gS] vkosnd dks eq[kfcj [kkl dh lwpuk ij fxjQ~rkj fd;k x;k gS ,oa laLohd`fr ds vk/kkj ij vfHk;qDr cuk;k x;k gS] ihf+Krk ds /kkjk 161 ,oa 164 na0iz0la0 ds c;ku ijLij fojks/kkHkk"kh gSa rFkk rgjhj ,oa ihfM+rk dh fpfdRlh; ijh{k.k vk[;k Hkh ijLij fojks/kkHkk"k gSaA mudk ;g Hkh dFku gS fd voj U;k;ky; esa ihfM+rk dk c;ku vfHk;kstu lk{kh la0 1 ds :i esa gks pqdk gS rFkk voj U;k;ky; esa mlus vkosnd dh vksj ns[kdj ;g dgk gS fd ;g og O;fDr ugha gS ftlus mlds lkFk xyr dke fd;k Fkk] bl izdkj vkosnd funksZ"k gS rFkk og bl izdj.k esa 21&9&2022 ls dkjkxkj es a fu:) gS] blfy, vkosnd dks tekur ij NksM+ fn;k tk;A

¶9

fo}ku vij 'kkldh; vf/koDrk us vkosnd ds fo}ku vf/koDrk ds rdksZ dk izcy fojks/k djrs gq, rdZ izLrqr fd;k fd vkosnd }kjk dkfjr vijk/k laKs; ,oa xEHkhj izd`fr dk gS] blfy, vkosnd dks tekur ij u NksM+k tk;A

¶10

vkosnd ds fo}ku vf/koDrk ds rdksZ ds ifjizs{; esa i=koyh ij miyC/k lkjoku rF;ksa ,oa ifjfLFkfr;ksa dk lexz :i ls voyksdu djus ds ckn] lcwrksa dh izd`fr vkSj fdlh Hkh Bksl fojks/kkRed lkexzh dh vuqifLFkfr ,oa miyC/k lkexzh ls NsM+NkM+ dh laHkkouk u gksus ds rF; dks ns[krs gq, esjh jk; esa vkosnd dks tekur ij eqDr djus dk mi;qDr vk/kkj gSA

¶11

vr% okn ds xq.k nks"k ij fcuk dksbZ fVIi.kh fd, gq, vkosnd dks mijksDr of.kZr vijk/k esa lacaf/kr U;k;ky; dh lUrqf"V ij O;fDrxr ca/k&i= ,oa vf/kd /kujkf’k ds nks LFkkuh; izfrHkw izLrqr djus ij fuEufyf[kr 'krksZ ds lkFk tekur ij NksM+ fn;k tk;A

¶12

1& vkosnd foospuk ;k ijh{k.k ds nkSjku vfHk;kstu lk{;ksa ds lkFk NsM + NkM+ ugha djsxkA

¶13

2& vkosnd vfHk;kstu lkf{k;ksa o ihfM+r@f’kdk;rdrkZ dks Mjk;sxk@/kedk;sxk ughaA

¶14

3& vkosnd U;k;ky; ds vkns’kksa dk ikyu djsxk] og ijh{k.k ds nkSjku fcuk dksbZ vuko’;d LFkxu fy, fu;r frfFk ij U;k;ky; esa mifLFkr gksxk rFkk ijh{k.k esa bZekunkjh ls lg;ksx djsxkA

¶15

4& vkosnd tekur ij fjgk gksus ds ckn tekur dh Lora=rk dk nq:i;ksx ugha djsxk vkSj fdlh Hkh vijkf/kd xfrfof/k esa fyIr ugha gksxk u dksbZ vijkf/kd d`R; djsxkA

¶16

5& vkosnd izR;{k ;k vizR;{k :i ls ekeys ds rF;ksa ls ifjfpr fdlh Hkh O;fDr ;k iqfyl vf/kdkfj;ksa dks dksbZ izyksHku ;k /kedh ugha nsxk u gh muls dksbZ ok;nk djsxk] ftlds dkj.k mUgsa U;k;ky; esa rF;ksa dks mtkxj djus ls fojr jguk iM+sA

¶17

mijksDr 'krksZ esa ls fdlh ds mYya?ku ds ekeys esa] ijh{k.k U;k;ky; vkosnd dh tekur fu;ekuqlkj jn~n djus dks Lora= gSA

fn0 % 9&10&2023

ds0lh0flag

2 of 2

Digitally signed by :- KAILASH CHANDRA SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Manoj @ Kala v. State of U.P. and 3 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Manoj @ Kala v. State of U.P. and 3 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Prem Singh Vs State of U.P.

Inam Vs State of U.P. and 3 Others

Rahul Sharma Vs State of U.P.

Sheetala Prasad Pandey Vs State of U.P. and 3 Others

Amit Sharma Vs State of U.P.

Dharmendra Kumar Sonkar Vs State of U.P.