Dismissed
Arshad v. State of U.P.
Allahabad HCBAIL/6144/2020
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
The single judge court dismissed a bail application under Section 439 CrPC for non-prosecution. The applicant was in jail but had no instructions via counsel present in court to argue the matter.
What did the court decide?
Bail application dismissed for lack of instructions and non-appearance.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
Court No. - 69
¶2
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 6144 of 2020
¶3
Applicant :- Arshad Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Ram Jee Saxena,Raghuvansh Chandra Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Brij Lal Shukla
¶4
Hon'ble Samit Gopal,J.
¶5
- List revised.
¶6
- Sri Raghuvansh Chandra, learned counsel for the applicant and Sri Ajay Singh, learned A.G.A.-I for the State are present. Sri Brij Lal Shukla, learned counsel for the first informant is not present even when the matter is taken in the revised list.
¶7
- Learned counsel for the applicant submits that he has no instructions in the matter on behalf of the applicant.
¶8
- The applicant was granted bail for a period of three months vide order dated 07.09.2020 after which he did not appear before the concerned court. The orders were passed for taking coercive action against him by this Court and even order was passed issuing non-bailable warrant by the trial court.
¶9
- As per the office report dated 11.12.2023 a report has been received from the concerned District & Sessions Judge stating therein that the applicant has been arrested and is in jail.
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- applicant
Arshad
Coram
AI extract
Samit Gopal
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · December
- Registered
- Case no.
- BAIL/6144/2020
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court