Dismissed

Danish @ Javed(Mohd.Javed) v. State of U.P. and 3 Others

Allahabad HC6 Feb 2023BAIL/603/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This judgment deals with a criminal miscellaneous bail application where the applicant sought relief under Sections 436 and 438 of the Cr.P.C. The court denied anticipatory bail as there was no sufficient apprehension of arrest, no medical records were produced, and the applicant was already in custody following the court order.

What did the court decide?

Bail was denied, and the applicant was remanded to judicial custody.

Danish @ Javed(Mohd.Javed) Vs State of U.P. and 3 Others — Anticipatory Bail | Allahabad HC (2023)

¶1

Court No. - 79

¶2

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 603 of 2023

¶3

Applicant :- Danish @ Javed(Mohd.Javed) Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Applicant :- Parvez Iqbal Ansari Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶4

Hon'ble Dr. Gautam Chowdhary,J.

¶5

orZeku nkf.Md izdh.kZ tekur izkFkZuk i=] vkosnd nkfu’k mQZ tkosn ( eks0 tkosn ) dh vksj ls eq0v0la0 86 lu 2022] vUrxZr /kkjk 363] 366] 368] 376] 120ch Hkk0na0fo0 ,oa 18] 5@6 ikDlks ,sDV] Fkkuk nf{k.kVksyk] ftyk em esa tekur ij eqDr djus gsrq izLrqr fd;k x;k gSA

¶6

vkosnd ds fo}ku vf/koDrk ,oa fo}ku vij 'kkldh; vf/koDrk dks lquk rFkk i=koyh dk ifj’khyu fd;kA

¶7

vkosnd ds fo}ku vf/koDrk us rdZ izLrqr fd;k fd vkosnd dks bl izdj.k esa xyr o QthZ rjhds ls >wBk QWlk;k x;k gS] mlus dfFkr vijk/k dkfjr ugha fd;k gS] rFkkdfFkr ?kVuk dh izkFkfedh 1 ekg ls vf/kd foyEc ls fy[kk;h x;h gS] vkosnd dk ihfM+rk ls dksbZ laca/k ugha gS] vkosnd ds fo:) mijksDr /kkjkvksa dk dksbZ vijk/k ugha curk gS] ihfM+rk dh cjkenxh vkosnd ds ikl ls ugha gq;h gS] vkosnd funksZ"k gS rFkk og bl izdj.k esa fn0 15&10&2022 ls dkjkxkj es a fu:) gS] blfy, vkosnd dks tekur ij NksM+ fn;k tk;A

¶8

fo}ku vij 'kkldh; vf/koDrk us vkosnd ds fo}ku vf/koDrk ds rdksZ dk izcy fd;kA

¶9

vkosnd ds fo}ku vf/koDrk ds rdksZ ds ifjizs{; esa i=koyh ij miyC/k lkjoku rF;ksa ,oa ifjfLFkfr;ksa dk lexz :i ls voyksdu djus ds ckn] lcwrksa dh izd`fr vkSj fdlh Hkh Bksl fojks/kkRed lkexzh dh vuqifLFkfr ,oa miyC/k lkexzh ls NsM+NkM+ dh laHkkouk u gksus ds rF; dks ns[krs gq, esjh jk; esa vkosnd dks tekur ij eqDr djus dk mi;qDr vk/kkj gSA

¶10

vr% okn ds xq.k nks"k ij fcuk dksbZ fVIi.kh fd, gq, vkosnd dks mijksDr of.kZr vijk/k esa lacaf/kr U;k;ky; dh lUrqf"V ij O;fDrxr ca/k&i= ,oa vf/kd /kujkf’k ds nks LFkkuh; izfrHkw izLrqr djus ij fuEufyf[kr 'krksZ ds lkFk tekur ij NksM+ fn;k tk;A

¶11

1& vkosnd foospuk ;k ijh{k.k ds nkSjku vfHk;kstu lk{;ksa ds lkFk NsM + NkM+ ugha djsxkA

¶12

2& vkosnd vfHk;kstu lkf{k;ksa o ihfM+r@f’kdk;rdrkZ dks Mjk;sxk@/kedk;sxk ughaA

¶13

3& vkosnd U;k;ky; ds vkns’kksa dk ikyu djsxk] og ijh{k.k ds nkSjku fcuk dksbZ vuko’;d LFkxu fy, fu;r frfFk ij U;k;ky; esa mifLFkr gksxk rFkk ijh{k.k esa bZekunkjh ls lg;ksx djsxkA

¶14

4& vkosnd tekur ij fjgk gksus ds ckn tekur dh Lora=rk dk nq:i;ksx ugha djsxk vkSj fdlh Hkh vijkf/kd xfrfof/k esa fyIr ugha gksxk u dksbZ vijkf/kd d`R; djsxkA

¶15

5& vkosnd izR;{k ;k vizR;{k :i ls ekeys ds rF;ksa ls ifjfpr fdlh Hkh O;fDr ;k iqfyl vf/kdkfj;ksa dks dksbZ izyksHku ;k /kedh ugha nsxk u gh muls dksbZ ok;nk djsxk] ftlds dkj.k mUgsa U;k;ky; esa rF;ksa dks mtkxj djus ls fojr jguk iM+sA

¶16

mijksDr 'krksZ esa ls fdlh ds mYya?ku ds ekeys esa] ijh{k.k U;k;ky; vkosnd dh tekur fu;ekuqlkj jn~n djus dks Lora= gSA

¶17

fn0 % 6&2&2023

¶18

ds0lh0flag

¶19

Digitally signed by :- KAILASH CHANDRA SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Danish @ Javed(Mohd.Javed) v. State of U.P. and 3 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Danish @ Javed(Mohd.Javed) v. State of U.P. and 3 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Shahrukh Vs State of U.P.

Nikhil Bharti Vs State of U.P.

Aman @ Ramu Vs State of U.P. and 3 Others

Rinku Vs State of U.P.

Kaluaa Vs State of U.P. and 3 Others

Lalitesh Kumar Vs State of U.P.