Learned counsel for the applicant contends that the applicant has been falsely implicated in the instant case. The applicant is the father-in-law of the deceased, who was granted anticipatory bail till the submission of police report. The applicant never demanded dowry or did he torture the deceased. In fact, the marriage of the deceased took place prior to nine years of the incident and that the applicant never interfered in the domestic life of the deceased and her husband. The applicant is bereaved by the death of her daughter-in-law and prays for peace of the departed soul. However, for the purpose of the bail application, it is submitted that the deceased was a temperamental lady who was prone to extreme reactions even on trivial issues. On the fateful day apparently after minor disagreement with her husband, the deceased committed suicide in a fit of rage by hanging herself. The cause of death recorded in the post mortem report is asphyxia due to ante mortem hanging.The applicant did not abet or instigate the deceased to commit the suicide.The applicant does not have any criminal history apart from the instant case. The applicant is not a flight risk.The applicant is a law abiding citizen who has cooperated with the police investigation and shall join the trial proceeding. There is no possibility of his influencing witnesses, tampering with the evidence or reoffending. He next submits that the co-accused persons namely, Ashwani Kumar, Naresh Kumar Verma, Babita have already been enlarged on bail vide orders dated