It has been contended by the learned counsel for the applicant that the applicant has been falsely implicated in the present case due to ulterior motive. It is next contended that the real fact is that the informant received amount i.e. Rs.90,000/- from the applicant as a loan during illness of his wife and also provided his A.T.M. Card with PIN number to the applicant to withdraw money from his Bank account in return of his loan amount. However, the applicant has only get Rs.45,000/- out of Rs.90,000/- from the informant and when the applicant asked for remaining amount then present FIR has been lodged. It is next contended that the applicant and informant are resident of same village and are blood relative. Several other submissions in order to demonstrate the falsity of the allegations made against the applicant have also been placed forth before the Court. The circumstances which, according to the counsel, led to the false implication of the accused has also been touched upon at length. It has been assured on behalf of the applicant that he is ready to
