This judgment rejects a bail application in a case involving alleged rape of a 14-year-old minor under POCSO and IPC provisions. The court held that the victim consistently stated the applicant committed the act and rejected claims of false implication due to village vendetta.
Bail application rejected; applicant not entitled to release on bail.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 74
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 58924 of 2022
Applicant :- Ahasan Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Applicant :- Aakash Sharma Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Mohd. Wasim
Hon'ble Sameer Jain,J.
that applicant committed rape with her, therefore, applicant should not be released on bail.
Order Date :- 24.4.2023 AK Pandey
Digitally signed by :- ANUPAM KUMAR PANDEY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the applicant is entitled to release on bail despite allegations of rape against a 14-year-old minor.
Whether the medical report and victim statements indicate false implication warranting bail.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Ahasan
State Of U.P.
Sameer Jain
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
