Allowed

Amit Yadav v. State of U.P.

Allahabad HC12 Oct 2023BAIL/57603/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court granted bail to the applicant in a bail application. The arrest was found unlawful as the applicant was previously on anticipatory bail, which was violated by the State acquiring judicial record and violating conditions, resulting in temporary detention.

What did the court decide?

Grants bail to Amit Yadav upon strict conditions including immediate compliance with bail terms, appearance before judicial magistrate, and adherence to prohibitions on disseminating information inter

Amit Yadav Vs State of U.P. — Bail and Remand | Allahabad HC (2023)

¶1

Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:197724

¶2

Court No. - 68

¶3

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 57603 of 2022

¶4

Applicant :- Amit Yadav Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Amarjeet Yadav Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Ashok Kumar Singh

¶5

Hon'ble Dr. Gautam Chowdhary,J.

¶6

orZeku nkf.Md izdh.kZ tekur izkFkZuk i=] vkosnd vfer ;kno dh vksj ls eq0v0la0 50 lu 2022] vUrxZr /kkjk 498&,] 304&ch] 504] 506 Hkk0na0fo0 ,oa 3@4 ngst izfr"ks/k vf/kfu;e] Fkkuk rjoka] ftyk vktex<+ esa tekur ij eqDr djus gsrq izLrqr fd;k x;k gSA

¶7

vkosnd ds fo}ku vf/koDrk] ifjoknh ds fo}ku vf/koDrk ,oa fo}ku vij 'kkldh; vf/koDrk dks lquk rFkk i=koyh dk ifj’khyu fd;kA

¶8

vkosnd ds fo}ku vf/koDrk dk dFku gS fd vkosnd dks bl izdj.k esa xyr ,oa QthZ rjhds ls >wBk QWlk;k x;k gS] mlus dfFkr vijk/k dkfjr ugha fd;k gS] vkosnd dk dksbZ iwoZ vkijkf/kd bfrgkl ugha gS] ?kVuk dh izkFkfedh jk; e’kfojk djds vR;f/kd foyEc ls fy[kk;h x;h gS ftldk dksbZ Li"Vhdj.k ugha fn;k x;k gS] bl ekeys esa vfHk;kstu lk{kh la0 2 ,oa 3 us fopkj.k U;k;ky; esa vfHk;kstu dFkkud dk leFkZu ugha fd;k gS rFkk os i{knzksgh gks x, gSa] vkosnd funksZ"k gS rFkk og bl izdj.k esa 30&3&2022 ls dkjkxkj es a fu:) gS] blfy, vkosnd dks tekur ij NksM+ fn;k tk;A

¶9

ifjoknh ds fo}ku vf/koDrk ,oa fo}ku vij 'kkldh; vf/koDrk us vkosnd ds fo}ku vf/koDrk ds rdksZ dk izcy fojks/k djrs gq, rdZ izLrqr fd;k fd vkosnd }kjk dkfjr vijk/k laKs; ,oa xEHkhj izd`fr dk gS] blfy, vkosnd dks tekur ij u NksM+k tk;A

¶10

vkosnd ds fo}ku vf/koDrk ds rdksZ ds ifjizs{; esa i=koyh ij miyC/k lkjoku rF;ksa ,oa ifjfLFkfr;ksa dk lexz :i ls voyksdu djus ds ckn] lcwrksa dh izd`fr vkSj fdlh Hkh Bksl fojks/kkRed lkexzh dh vuqifLFkfr ,oa miyC/k lkexzh ls NsM+NkM+ dh laHkkouk u gksus ds rF; dks ns[krs gq, esjh jk; esa vkosnd dks tekur ij eqDr djus dk mi;qDr vk/kkj gSA

¶11

vr% okn ds xq.k nks"k ij fcuk dksbZ fVIi.kh fd, gq, vkosnd dks mijksDr of.kZr vijk/k esa lacaf/kr U;k;ky; dh lUrqf"V ij O;fDrxr ca/k&i= ,oa vf/kd /kujkf’k ds nks LFkkuh; izfrHkw izLrqr djus ij fuEufyf[kr 'krksZ ds lkFk tekur ij NksM+ fn;k tk;A

¶12

1& vkosnd foospuk ;k ijh{k.k ds nkSjku vfHk;kstu lk{;ksa ds lkFk NsM + NkM+ ugha djsxkA

¶13

2& vkosnd vfHk;kstu lkf{k;ksa o ihfM+r@f’kdk;rdrkZ dks Mjk;sxk@/kedk;sxk ughaA

¶14

3& vkosnd U;k;ky; ds vkns’kksa dk ikyu djsxk] og ijh{k.k ds nkSjku fcuk dksbZ vuko’;d LFkxu fy, fu;r frfFk ij U;k;ky; esa mifLFkr gksxk rFkk ijh{k.k esa bZekunkjh ls lg;ksx djsxkA

¶15

4& vkosnd tekur ij fjgk gksus ds ckn tekur dh Lora=rk dk nq:i;ksx ugha djsxk vkSj fdlh Hkh vijkf/kd xfrfof/k esa fyIr ugha gksxk u dksbZ vijkf/kd d`R; djsxkA

¶16

5& vkosnd izR;{k ;k vizR;{k :i ls ekeys ds rF;ksa ls ifjfpr fdlh Hkh O;fDr ;k iqfyl vf/kdkfj;ksa dks dksbZ izyksHku ;k /kedh ugha nsxk u gh muls dksbZ ok;nk djsxk] ftlds dkj.k mUgsa U;k;ky; esa rF;ksa dks mtkxj djus ls fojr jguk iM+sA

¶17

mijksDr 'krksZ esa ls fdlh ds mYya?ku ds ekeys esa] ijh{k.k U;k;ky; vkosnd dh tekur fu;ekuqlkj jn~n djus dks Lora= gSA

fn0 % 12&10&2023

ds0lh0flag

2 of 2

Digitally signed by :- KAILASH CHANDRA SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Amit Yadav v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Amit Yadav v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Hargyan @ Amarjeet Vs State of U.P. and 3 Others

Ravi Vs State of U.P.

Rijwan Vs State of U.P.

Bhanu @ Pramod Kumar Vs State of U.P. and 3 Others

Sadik Vs State of U.P.

Subedar @ Subedar Singh Vs State of U.P. and Another