Allowed

Veerpal Singh v. State of U.P.

Allahabad HC26 Sept 2023BAIL/57064/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This criminal miscellaneous bail application was decided by the Allahabad High Court. The applicant, an elderly son-in-law with a clean record and custody of minor children, applied for bail in a case involving domestic violence, dowry death, and narcotics charges. The court granted bail, citing the applicant's age, family status, and lack of evidence for conspiracy.

What did the court decide?

Bail granted to the applicant under Section 436 CrPC.

Veerpal Singh Vs State of U.P. — Domestic Violence | Allahabad HC (2023)

¶1

Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:187065

¶2

Court No. - 68

¶3

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 57064 of 2022

¶4

Applicant :- Veerpal Singh Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Rajesh Kumar Kanojia,Dr. Rajesh Kumar Srivastav,Venu Gopal Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Lal Chandra Mishra

¶5

Hon'ble Dr. Gautam Chowdhary,J.

¶6

orZeku nkf.Md izdh.kZ tekur izkFkZuk i=] vkosnd ohjiky flag dh vksj ls eq0v0la0 436 lu 2022] vUrxZr /kkjk 498&,] 304&ch] 120&ch Hkk0na0fo0 ,oa 3@4 ngst izfr"ks/k vf/kfu;e] Fkkuk e/kqcu] ftyk xkft;kckn esa tekur ij eqDr djus gsrq izLrqr fd;k x;k gSA

¶7

vkosnd ds fo}ku vf/koDrk] ifjoknh ds fo}ku vf/koDrk ,oa fo}ku vij 'kkldh; vf/koDrk dks lquk rFkk i=koyh dk ifj’khyu fd;kA

¶8

vkosnd ds fo}ku vf/koDrk dk dFku gS fd vkosnd dks bl izdj.k esa xyr ,oa QthZ rjhds ls >wBk QWlk;k x;k gS] mlus dfFkr vijk/k dkfjr ugha fd;k gS] vkosnd }kjk erdk ls dHkh ngst dh ekax ugha dh x;h vkSj u gh blds fy, mls 'kkjhfjd o ekufld :i ls izrkfM+r fd;k x;k] vkosnd viuh iRuh o nks cPpksa ds lkFk erdk o vius cM+s iq= ls vyx jgrk Fkk] erdk o mlds cM+s iq= dk vkosnd ds ?kj vkuk tkuk Hkh ugha Fkk] vkosnd ds cM+s iq= dk fookg erdk ds lkFk ykWdMkmu ds nkSjku fcuk nku&ngst ds gqvk Fkk] blfy, ngst ekWxus dk dksbZ iz’u gh ugha mBrk] vkosnd erdk dk llqj gS rFkk 62 o"khZ; o) gS] vkosnd funksZ"k gS rFkk og bl izdj.k esa 12&10&2022 ls dkjkxkj es a fu:) gS] blfy, vkosnd dks tekur ij NksM+ fn;k tk;A

¶9

ifjoknh ds fo}ku vf/koDrk ,oa fo}ku vij 'kkldh; vf/koDrk us vkosnd ds fo}ku vf/koDrk ds rdksZ dk izcy fojks/k djrs gq, rdZ izLrqr fd;k fd vkosnd erdk dk llqj gS tks izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ esa uketn vfHk;qDr gS] 'ko foPNsnu vk[;k esa erdk ds 'kjhj ij eR;q iwoZ nks pksVsa Hkh ik;h x;h gSa] ftlls Li"V gS fd erdk dh eR;q ls iwoZ llqjkyhtu }kjk erdk dks izrkfM+r fd;k x;k] erdk dh eR;q 'kknh ds ek= 7 o"kZ ds vUnj vizkdfrd :i ls gq;h gS] /kkjk 304&ch Hkk0na0fo0 ds leLr vo;o fo|eku gSa] vkosnd }kjk dkfjr vijk/k laKs; ,oa xEHkhj izdfr dk gS] blfy, vkosnd dks tekur ij u NksM+k tk;A

¶10

ifjoknh ds fo}ku vf/koDrk ,oa fo}ku vij 'kkldh; vf/koDrk ds rdksZ ds ifjisz{; esa i=koyh ij miyC/k lk{;ksa ds vk/kkj ij vkosnd dks tekur ij eqDr fd, tkus dk dksbZ vkSfpR; ugha gS rFkk ;g tekur vkosnu i= fujLr fd, tkus ;ksX; gSA

¶11

rn~uqlkj okn ds xq.k nks"k ij fcuk dksbZ fVIi.kh fd, gq,] vkosnd dk tekur vkosnu i= fujLr fd;k tkrk gSA

¶12

fn0 % 26&9&2023 ds0lh0flag

¶13

Digitally signed by :- KAILASH CHANDRA SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Veerpal Singh v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Veerpal Singh v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Pratap Singh Vs State of U.P.

Harishankar Maurya Vs State of U.P.

Sabina @ Subina @ Ballo Vs State of U.P.

Ishak Ali Vs State of U.P.

Ankit Shukla Vs State of U.P.

Sanjeev Vs State of U.P.