Allowed

Ashraf v. State of U.P. and 3 Others

Allahabad HC16 Feb 2023BAIL/56427/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 56427 of 2022, the Allahabad High Court granted bail to the applicant Ashraf in a case involving offences under Sections 363, 376(2)(n) IPC and POCSO Act. The court ordered release on personal bond and sureties subject to strict conditions regarding evidence and court attendance.

What did the court decide?

Released on bail on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount, subject to five specific conditions.

Ashraf Vs State of U.P. and 3 Others — Child Sexual Offences (POCSO) | Allahabad HC (2023)

¶1

Court No. - 73 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 56427 of 2022 Applicant :- Ashraf Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Applicant :- Purushottam Pandey Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Dhirendra Kumar Verma

¶2

Hon'ble Siddharth,J.

¶3

Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as the learned AGA for the State and perused the material placed on record.

¶4

The instant bail application has been filed on behalf of the applicant, Ashraf, with a prayer to release him on bail in Case Crime No. 690 of 2022 under Sections 363, 376(2) N, IPC and Section 5L/6 POCSO Act, Police Station Baradari, DistrictBareilly, during pendency of trial.

¶5

There is allegation against the applicant of enticement of minor girl with intent to marry, commission of offence of rape and offence under Section 5L/6 POCSO Act.

¶6

Learned counsel for the applicant has submitted that as per the medical report the age of the victim is 17 years. Given margin of one year, she can be considered major. Her statement under section 164 Cr.P.C., shows that she was clearly a consenting party has entered into marriage and she wants to live with applicant.. The applicant has been falsely implicated in this case. He has criminal history of five cases to his credit and is languishing in jail since 30.07.2022. The trial in the aforesaid case is not likely to be concluded in near future.

¶7

Per contra learned A.G.A. has opposed the prayer for bail of the applicant by contending that the innocence of the applicant cannot be adjudged at pre trial stage, therefore, he does not deserves any indulgence. In case the applicant is released on bail he will again indulge in similar activities and will misuse the liberty of bail.

¶8

Having considered the submissions of the parties noted above, finding force in the submissions made by the learned counsel for the applicant, keeping in view the uncertainty regarding conclusion of trial; one sided investigation by police, ignoring the case of accused side; applicant being under-trial having fundamental right to speedy trial; larger mandate of the Article 21 of the Constitution of India, considering the dictum of Apex Court in the case of Satendra Kumar Antil Vs. C.B.I. & Another, passed in S.L.P. (Crl.) No. 5191 of 2021, judgement dated 11.7.2022 and

¶9

considering 5-6 times overcrowding in jails over and above their capacity by under trials and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, let the applicant involved in the aforesaid crime be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions that :-

¶10

(i) The applicant shall not tamper with the evidence or threaten the witnesses.

¶11

(ii) The applicant shall file an undertaking to the effect that he shall not seek any adjournment on the dates fixed for evidence when the witnesses are present in Court. In case of default of this condition, it shall be open for the Trial Court to treat it as abuse of liberty of bail and pass orders in accordance with law.

¶12

(iii) The applicant shall remain present before the Trial Court on each date fixed, either personally or as directed by the Court. In case of his absence, without sufficient cause, the Trial Court may proceed against him under Section 229-A of the Indian Penal Code.

¶13

(iv) In case the applicant misuse the liberty of bail during trial and in order to secure his presence, proclamation under Section 82 Cr.P.C. is issued and the applicants fail to appear before the Court on the date fixed in such proclamation then the Trial Court shall initiate proceedings against him in accordance with law under Section 174-A of the Indian Penal Code.

¶14

(v) The applicant shall remain present in person before the Trial Court on the dates fixed for (i) opening of the case, (ii) framing of charge and (iii) recording of statement under Section 313 Cr.P.C. If in the opinion of the Trial Court absence of the applicant is deliberate or without sufficient cause, then it shall be open for the Trial Court to treat such default as abuse of liberty of bail and proceed against him in accordance with law.

¶15

In case, of breach of any of the above conditions, it shall be a ground for cancellation of bail.

¶16

Identity and residence proof of the applicant and sureties be verified by the court concerned before the bonds are accepted.

¶17

Order Date :- 16.2.2023 Abhishek

¶18

Digitally signed by :- ABHISHEK YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Ashraf v. State of U.P. and 3 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ashraf v. State of U.P. and 3 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Pulkit Vs State of U.P. and 3 Others

Musheer Khan Vs State of U.P. and 3 Others

Vikas Vs State of U.P. and 3 Others

Mukesh Kumar Vs State of U.P.

Kashinath Tiwari Vs State of U.P. and 3 Others

Ram Bhajan Kol Vs State of U.P.