Rajnesh @ Rajnish v. State of U.P.
Case brief
What is this about?
The bail application was dismissed as infructuous because the applicant had already been convicted, rendering the application devoid of merit.
The bail application was dismissed as infructuous because the applicant had already been convicted, rendering the application devoid of merit.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 79
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 55787 of 2019
Applicant :- Rajnesh @ Rajnish Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Raghuvansh Misra,Rajesh Kumar Verma Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Krishan Pahal,J.
List has been revised.
Sri Rajesh Kumar Verma, learned counsel for the applicant, has stated that the applicant has been convicted, as such, the bail application is rendered infructuous and may be dismissed as infructuous.
Accordingly, the bail application stands dismissed as infructuous.
Order Date :- 27.3.2023 Shalini
Digitally signed by :- SHALINI JAISWAL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Rajnesh @ Rajnish
Krishan Pahal
Shalini Jaiswal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court