Lalit v. State of U.P. and Another
Case brief
What is this about?
The single judge held that the anticipatory bail application had become infructuous and disposed of the same accordingly.
What the court decided
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:147402
Court No. - 73
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 55673 of 2019
Applicant :- Lalit Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Dhiraj Srivastava Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Rama Nand Shukla
Hon'ble Nalin Kumar Srivastava,J.
- It has been submitted by the learned counsel for the applicant that this anticipatory bail application has now become infructuous, therefore the same may be disposed of.
- In view of that, there is no justification to proceed further in the matter.
- Anticipatory bail application, being infructuous, is disposed of accordingly.
Order Date :- 20.7.2023 ss
Digitally signed by :- SANDEEP SHARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Lalit
Coram
Nalin Kumar Srivastava
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · July
- Registered
- Case no.
- BAIL/55673/2019
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court