Allowed

Amir v. State of U.P.

Allahabad HC11 Jan 2023BAIL/55247/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 55247 of 2022, the Allahabad High Court granted bail to the applicant, a functionary accused under the Factories Act. The court held that the applicant is a functionary and released him on trial bond subject to specific sureties and conditions regarding attendance and conduct at the trial.

What did the court decide?

Applicant released on trial bond subject to four conditions: attendance at trial and inquiries, no absconding, cooperation with inquiries, and refraining from influencing or coercing any person or bod

Amir Vs State of U.P. — Bail and Remand | Allahabad HC (2023)

¶1

Court No. - 79

¶2

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 55247 of 2022

¶3

Applicant :- Amir Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Mohd. Zaid,Pratik J. Nagar Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶4

Hon'ble Dr. Gautam Chowdhary,J.

¶5

fo}ku vij 'kkldh; vf/koDrk us y?kq izfr’kiFki= nkf[ky fd;k] bls i=koyh ij j[kk tk;A

¶6

orZeku nkf.Md izdh.kZ tekur izkFkZuk i=] vkosnd vkfej dh vksj ls eq0v0la0 361 lu 2022] vUrxZr /kkjk 498,] 376] 323] 504] 506 Hkk0na0fo0] /kkjk 3@4 ngst izfr"ks/k vf/kfu;e rFkk /kkjk 3@4 eqfLye oksesu izksVsD’ku vkQ jkbV vku eSjst ,sDV] Fkkuk dkaB] ftyk eqjknkckn esa tekur ij eqDr djus gsrq izLrqr fd;k x;k gSA

¶7

vkosnd ds fo}ku vf/koDrk ,oa fo}ku vij 'kkldh; vf/koDrk dks lquk rFkk i=koyh dk ifj’khyu

¶8

fd;kA

¶9

vkosnd ds fo}ku vf/koDrk us rdZ izLrqr fd;k fd vkosnd dks bl izdj.k esa xyr o QthZ rjhds ls >wBk QWlk;k x;k gS] mlus dfFkr vijk/k dkfjr ugha fd;k gSA mudk ;g Hkh dFku gS fd bl izdj.k esa i{kdkjksa esa voj U;k;ky; esa lqyg&le>kSrk gks x;k gS rFkk 'kiFkdrhZ vkjQk us voj U;k;ky; esa ;g Hkh dgk gS fd ikfjokfjd fookn gksus ds dkj.k mlus vkosnd dk uke fy[kok fn;k FkkA bl izdkj vkosnd funksZ"k gS rFkk og bl izdj.k esa fn0 29&9&2022 ls dkjkxkj es a fu:) gS] blfy, vkosnd dks tekur ij NksM+ fn;k tk;A

¶10

fo}ku vij 'kkldh; vf/koDrk us vkosnd ds tekur dk izcy fojks/k fd;kA

¶11

vkosnd ds fo}ku vf/koDrk ds rdksZ ds ifjizs{; esa i=koyh ij miyC/k lkjoku rF;ksa ,oa ifjfLFkfr;ksa dk lexz :i ls voyksdu djus ds ckn] lcwrksa dh izd`fr vkSj fdlh Hkh Bksl fojks/kkRed lkexzh dh vuqifLFkfr ,oa miyC/k lkexzh ls NsM+NkM+ dh laHkkouk u gksus ds rF; dks ns[krs gq, esjh jk; esa vkosnd dks tekur ij eqDr djus dk mi;qDr vk/kkj gSA

¶12

vr% okn ds xq.k nks"k ij fcuk dksbZ fVIi.kh fd, gq, vkosnd dks mijksDr of.kZr vijk/k esa lacaf/kr U;k;ky; dh lUrqf"V ij O;fDrxr ca/k&i= ,oa vf/kd /kujkf’k ds nks LFkkuh; izfrHkw izLrqr djus ij fuEufyf[kr 'krksZ ds lkFk tekur ij NksM+ fn;k tk;A

¶13

1& vkosnd foospuk ;k ijh{k.k ds nkSjku vfHk;kstu lk{;ksa ds lkFk NsM + NkM+ ugha djsxkA

¶14

2& vkosnd vfHk;kstu lkf{k;ksa o ihfM+r@f’kdk;rdrkZ dks Mjk;sxk@/kedk;sxk ughaA

¶15

3& vkosnd U;k;ky; ds vkns’kksa dk ikyu djsxk] og ijh{k.k ds nkSjku fcuk dksbZ vuko’;d LFkxu fy, fu;r frfFk ij U;k;ky; esa mifLFkr gksxk rFkk ijh{k.k esa bZekunkjh ls lg;ksx djsxkA

¶16

4& vkosnd tekur ij fjgk gksus ds ckn tekur dh Lora=rk dk nq:i;ksx ugha djsxk vkSj fdlh Hkh vijkf/kd xfrfof/k esa fyIr ugha gksxk u dksbZ vijkf/kd d`R; djsxkA

¶17

5& vkosnd izR;{k ;k vizR;{k :i ls ekeys ds rF;ksa ls ifjfpr fdlh Hkh O;fDr ;k iqfyl vf/kdkfj;ksa dks dksbZ izyksHku ;k /kedh ugha nsxk u gh muls dksbZ ok;nk djsxk] ftlds dkj.k mUgsa U;k;ky; esa rF;ksa dks mtkxj djus ls fojr jguk iM+sA

¶18

mijksDr 'krksZ esa ls fdlh ds mYya?ku ds ekeys esa] ijh{k.k U;k;ky; vkosnd dh tekur fu;ekuqlkj jn~n djus dks Lora= gSA

¶19

fn0 % 11&1&2023

¶20

ds0lh0flag

¶21

Digitally signed by :- KAILASH CHANDRA SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Amir v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Amir v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Arbaj @ Waris Vs State of U.P. and 3 Others

Prabal Kumar @ Suraj Vs State of U.P.

Amit Vs State of U.P.

Rajendra Kumar Kushwaha Vs State of U.P.

Imran Vs State of U.P.

Kalamuddin Alias Pinti Vs State of U.P.