Rahul v. State of U.P.
Case brief
What is this about?
Criminal Misc. Bail Application allowed. The High Court granted bail to the applicant涉嫌 abetment to suicide, distinguishing his role from the main accused and noting CDR evidence complicity lies solely with another co-accused.
What did the court decide?
Release on bail with personal bond and two heavy sureties subject to conditions not to tamper with evidence, intimidate witnesses, and not commit similar offences.
What the court decided
Court No. - 79
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 55123 of 2022
Applicant :- Rahul Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Onkar Singh,Amit Rai,Sanjay Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Pankaj Bharti
Hon'ble Krishan Pahal,J.
- List has been revised.
- Supplementary affidavit filed today is taken on record.
- Heard Shri Amit Rai, learned counsel for the applicant and Shri Pankaj Bharti, learned counsel for the informant as well as Shri V.K.S. Parmar, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record.
- Applicant seeks bail in Case Crime No.360 of 2022, under Sections 306, 506 and 507 I.P.C., Police Station Civil Lines, District Muzaffarnagar, during the pendency of trial.
- As per prosecution story, the marriage of the daughter of the informant was solemnized with Deepak as per Hindu Rites on 23.04.2022. The applicant alongwith co-accused persons, namely, Sonu and Vijaypal, are stated to have abetted her to commit suicide. The daughter of the informant is stated to have committed suicide on 21.09.2022 at about 10:30 PM in the house of her in-laws.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the applicant is eligible for bail in a trial stage criminal offence involving abetment to suicide.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Rahul
Coram
Krishan Pahal
Ravi Kant
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · April
- Registered
- Case no.
- BAIL/55123/2022
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court