Brahm Singh v. State of U.P.
Case brief
What is this about?
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No.…
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No.…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 81
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 5420 of 2021
Applicant :- Brahm Singh Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Vikrant Rana Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Arvind Singh
Hon'ble Mrs. Saroj Yadav,J.
At the very outset, Sri Chandra Veer Singh, Advocate holding brief of Sri Vikrant Rana, learned counsel for the applicant submitted that the accused applicant has already been acquitted by the trial Court, as such, the present bail applicant has become infructuous.
In view of the above statement made by learned counsel for the accused applicant, this bail application is rejected as having become infructuous .
(Mrs. Saroj Yadav, J.)
Order Date :- 8.2.2023 Arun
Digitally signed by :- ARUN KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Brahm Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court