The High Court dismissed an anticipatory bail application filed in 2019 as infructuous due to the long delay and the fact that the charge-sheet had already been submitted.
Application dismissed as infructuous; interim protection, if any, vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:191413
Court No. - 72
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 54101 of 2019
Applicant :- Smt. Satya Sharma Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Atul Tej Kulshrestha,Sanjeev Kumar Tyagi Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Ch. Dil Nisar,Kulveer Singh
Hon'ble Krishan Pahal,J.
Order Date :- 5.10.2023 Vikas
[Krishan Pahal, J.]
Digitally signed by :- VIKAS VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the anticipatory bail application filed in 2019 should be allowed given the long pendency and submitted final report.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Satender Kumar Antil vs. CBI and anotherReferred¶8
Satender Kumar Antil vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and another, 2022 SCC Online SC 825 · Who else cites this
Ishwarlal Mali Rathod v. GopalReferred¶8
Ishwarlal Mali Rathod v. Gopal, (2021) 12 SCC 612 · Who else cites this
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Smt. Satya Sharma
Krishan Pahal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
