Allowed

Kale @ Sahab Singh v. State of U.P.

Allahabad HC23 Jan 2023BAIL/53905/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This bail application was filed by Kale @ Sahab Singh in a murder and attempt to murder case. The court granted bail based on the parity principle after a co-accused was granted bail. The order imposed strict conditions regarding evidence tampering, court presence, and trial attendance, directing the trial to be concluded within six months.

What did the court decide?

Release of applicant on bail upon furnishing personal bond and two sureties satisfying specified court conditions.

Kale @ Sahab Singh Vs State of U.P. — Murder and Culpable Homicide | Allahabad HC (2023)

¶1

Court No. - 73

¶2

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 53905 of 2022

¶3

Applicant :- Kale @ Sahab Singh Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Akash Dwivedi Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Anjali Singh Tomer,Gaurav Singh Tomar,Inder Pal Singh Tomar

¶4

Hon'ble Siddharth,J.

¶5

Heard Sri Akash Dwivedi, learned counsel for the applicant; Ms. Nushra Siddhiqui, Advocate, holding brief of Ms. Anjali Singh Tomer, learned counsel for the informant; learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the material on record.

¶6

The instant bail application has been filed on behalf of the applicant, Kale @ Sahab Singh, with a prayer to release him on bail in Case Crime No. 234 of 2017, under Sections 147, 148, 149, 302, 307, 504, 34 IPC Police Station Khekra, DistrictBaghpat during pendency of trial.

¶7

Learned counsel for the applicant has contended that the coaccused, Babu, has been granted bail by this Court on 20.10.2022 in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No.24570 of 2019. The case of the applicant stands on identical footing, hence the applicant is also entitled for bail on the ground of parity for the reasons given in bail application of co-accused. The applicant is languishing in jail since 11.7.2017.

¶8

Learned AGA has opposed the prayer for bail, but does not dispute the claim of parity.

¶9

Let the applicant involved in aforesaid case be released on bail on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions which are being imposed in the interest of justice:-

¶10

(i) The applicant shall not tamper with the evidence or threaten the witnesses.

¶11

(ii) The applicant shall file an undertaking to the effect that he shall not seek any adjournment on the dates fixed for evidence when the witnesses are present in Court. In case of default of this condition, it shall be open for the Trial Court to treat it as abuse of liberty of bail and pass orders in accordance with law.

¶12

(iii) The applicant shall remain present before the Trial Court on each date fixed, either personally or as directed by the Court. In case of his absence, without sufficient cause, the Trial Court may proceed against him under Section 229-A of the Indian Penal Code.

¶13

(iv) In case the applicant misuse the liberty of bail during trial and in order to secure his presence, proclamation under Section 82 Cr.P.C. is issued and the applicants fail to appear before the Court

¶14

on the date fixed in such proclamation then the Trial Court shall initiate proceedings against him in accordance with law under Section 174-A of the Indian Penal Code.

¶15

(v) The applicant shall remain present in person before the Trial Court on the dates fixed for (i) opening of the case, (ii) framing of charge and (iii) recording of statement under Section 313 Cr.P.C. If in the opinion of the Trial Court absence of the applicant is deliberate or without sufficient cause, then it shall be open for the Trial Court to treat such default as abuse of liberty of bail and proceed against him in accordance with law.

¶16

In case of breach of any of the above conditions, it shall be a ground for cancellation of bail.

¶17

Identity and residence proof of the applicant and sureties be verified by the court concerned before the bonds are accepted.

¶18

The court below is directed to conclude the trial against the applicant, as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of six months from the date of production of certified copy of this order.

¶19

Order Date :- 23.1.2023 Ruchi Agrahari

¶20

Digitally signed by :- RUCHI AGRAHARI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Kale @ Sahab Singh v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Kale @ Sahab Singh v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rohan Vs State of U.P.

Smt. Urmila Devi Vs State of U.P.

Pradyumn Singh Vs State of Up through Sec. Home and 3 Others

Gulab Pal Vs State of U.P.

Sudama @ Anuruddha Singh Vs State of U.P. and 3 Others

Surendra Kumar Vs State of U.P. and 3 Others