The High Court granted bail to Raghuveer Kumar and Suraj Kumar in aconversion-related trial. Noting the absence of independent witnesses and lack of evidence linking the applicants to the offence, the court released them on personal surety bonds.
Applicants released on bail on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:236727
Court No. - 74
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 53572 of 2023
Applicant :- Raghuveer Kumar And Another Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Patsy David,Mary Puncha (Sheeb Jose),Mohd. Kalim
Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Vivek Varma,J.
i. the applicants shall not temper with the prosecution evidence;
ii. the applicants shall not pressurize the prosecution witness;
iii. the applicants shall appear on each and every date fixed by trial court.
Order Date :- 14.12.2023 S.S.
Digitally signed by :- SIDDHARTH SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the applicants are entitled to bail under Section 439 Cr.P.C. given the lack of substantive evidence and independent witnesses.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Raghuveer Kumar
Suraj Kumar
Vivek Varma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
