Dismissed
Ravi Prakash v. State of U.P.
Allahabad HCBAIL/53289/2019
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Bail application dismissed for want of prosecution due to absence of the applicant's counsel without request for adjournment.
What did the court decide?
Application under s. 438 Cr.P.C. dismissed. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
Court No. - 73
¶2
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 53289 of 2019
¶3
Applicant :- Ravi Prakash Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Mohit Singh,Abhinav Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
¶4
Hon'ble Nalin Kumar Srivastava,J.
¶5
- List has been revised.
¶6
- None appears on behalf of the applicant inspite of repeated calls.
¶7
- There is no request for adjournment on behalf of the applicant.
¶8
- Learned A.G.A. for the State is present.
¶9
- Application u/s 438 Cr.P.C. is dismissed for want of prosecution.
¶10
- Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
¶11
Order Date :- 29.11.2023 ss
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- applicant
Ravi Prakash
- respondent
State of U.P.
Coram
AI extract
Nalin Kumar Srivastava
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · November
- Registered
- Case no.
- BAIL/53289/2019
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court