The Allahabad High Court dismissed an anticipatory bail application filed in 2019 as infructuous due to an unexplained delay spanning several years, noting the applicant's absence from recent hearings and the statutory time-bar for disposal.
The application was dismissed as infructuous; interim protection, if any, was vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:173083
Court No. - 72
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 53286 of 2019
Applicant :- Parminder Singh Alias Vishal Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Dinesh Kacker Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Krishan Pahal,J.
(Justice Krishan Pahal)
Order Date :- 28.8.2023 Siddhant
Digitally signed by :- SIDDHANT SAHU High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the anticipatory bail application which remained pending for years without any active pursuit can be dismissed as infructuous.
Whether the statutory requirement for disposal within thirty days or six weeks compels dismissal of long-pending anticipatory bail applications.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Satender Kumar Antil vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and anotherReferred¶8
Satender Kumar Antil vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and another, reported in 2022 SCC Online SC 825 · Who else cites this
Ishwarlal Mali Rathod v. GopalReferred¶9
Ishwarlal Mali Rathod v. Gopal, (2021) 12 SCC 612 · Who else cites this
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Parminder Singh Alias Vishal
Krishan Pahal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
