Ranjana Devi v. State of U.P. and Another
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court dismissed the anticipatory bail application as infructuous because the applicant had no longer any need for the shelter sought.
The High Court dismissed the anticipatory bail application as infructuous because the applicant had no longer any need for the shelter sought.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:235743
Court No. - 73
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 52719 of 2019
Applicant :- Ranjana Devi Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Bhagwan Dutt Pandey,Ashok Kumar Gupta
Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Nalin Kumar Srivastava,J.
Order Date :- 12.12.2023 ss
Digitally signed by :- SANDEEP SHARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the anticipatory bail application becomes infructuous when the shelter sought from it is no longer required.
Ranjana Devi
Nalin Kumar Srivastava
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court