In this criminal bail application before the Allahabad High Court, the applicant sought release on bail citing contradictions in witness statements recorded during trial. The court rejected the application, holding that evidence appreciation is not permissible at the bail stage and no new grounds existed.
Bail application rejected; no release granted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:151167
Court No. - 70
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 52693 of 2022
Applicant :- Bheem Gupta Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Anand Prakash Yadav,Krishna Nand Yadav Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Sameer Jain,J.
the ground that there are material contradictions in the statements of witnesses who appeared before the trial court.
Order Date :- 27.7.2023 AK Pandey
Digitally signed by :- ANUPAM KUMAR PANDEY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the trial court can appreciate evidence at the bail stage.
Whether fresh grounds are available for granting bail after a prior application was dismissed.
Bheem Gupta
State of U.P.
Sameer Jain
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
