Mursan v. State of U.P.
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court allowed bail to the applicant Mursan framed under sections 380, 457, 411, and 471 IPC for cheating and forgery, imposing personal bond and sureties.
What did the court decide?
Released on furnishing personal bond and two sureties each in the amount to be fixed by the lower court.
What the court decided
Court No. - 74
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 52336 of 2022
Applicant :- Mursan Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Sushil Kumar Pandey Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Ajay Bhanot,J.
By means of this bail application the applicant has prayed to be enlarged on bail in Case Crime No. 349 of 2022 at Police Station Shahpur, District Muzaffar Nagar under Sections 380, 457, 411, 471,I.P.C. The applicant is in jail since 07.10.2022.
The bail application of the applicant was rejected by learned trial court on 01.11.2022.
The following arguments made by Shri Sushil Kumar Pandey, learned counsel on behalf of the applicant, which could not be satisfactorily refuted by Shri Paritosh Kumar Malviya, learned AGA-I from the record, entitle the applicant for grant of bail:
(1). Rs. 3,41,700/- was planted on the applicant to frame him in the instant case to show burnish the credentials of the police investigators.
(2). There is no independent witness to the recovery.
(3). The money belongs to the applicant.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Mursan
Coram
Ajay Bhanot
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · January
- Registered
- Case no.
- BAIL/52336/2022
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court