Criminal bail application rejected by the Court because the applicant failed to appear despite being called in the revised list, resulting in rejection for want of prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:180983
Court No. - 73
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 52085 of 2019
Applicant :- Riyaz Mohd @ Raju Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Applicant :- Kailash Choudhary,Sudhir Kumar Tripathi Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Nalin Kumar Srivastava,J.
None appears for the applicant even when the case is called in the revised list. Learned A.G.A. is present.
It appears that the accused applicant is no more interested in the proceeding of this application as on the earlier date also none was present for the applicant.
The application is rejected for want of prosecution.
Order Date :- 19.9.2023 Fhd
Digitally signed by :- FAHAD NIYAZ High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Riyaz Mohd @ Raju
State Of U.P.
2 Others
Nalin Kumar Srivastava
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
