Sachin v. State of U.P.
Case brief
What is this about?
In this bail application, the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad considered the plea of the applicant for release on bail. The order was delivered by a single Judge and resulted in the disposal of the matter.
What the court decided
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:98025
Court No. - 78
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 51739 of 2022
Applicant :- Sachin Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Gaurav Kakkar,Rishab Agrawal Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Dr. Gautam Chowdhary,J.
वररममनदमणणणकपककररजममनरपमररनमपतआववदकसचचन ककओरसवमम०अ०स० 865/2020, अनरर धमरम 302, 120 बबभम०दद०चव०, रमनमससचवललमइन, सजलम ममरमदमबमदममजममनरपरममककरनवहवरमपसरमरचकयमरयमहह।
आववदककवचवदमनअसधवकमएवदचवदमनअपरशमसककयअसधवकमककसमनमररमपतमवलब कमपररशबलनचकयम।
आववदककवचवदमनअसधवकमनवरकरपसरमरचकयमचकआववदकककइसपकररममरलरएवद फजरढदरसवझझठमफदसमयमरयमहह, उसनवकसररअपरमधकमरररनहहचकयमहह।आववदक, ममरकमकमभमईहह।आववदकदमरमममरकमककहतयमनहहककरयबहह।आववदकककमममलवमम पररणसरचरजनयरथययकवआधमरपरनमचमरचकयमरयमहह।मममलवमम सहअचभयमक/आववदक कवममरम-चपरमककजममनरइसनयमयमलयकवअनयनयमयपबठदमरमपझवरममसवबकमरककजम चमककहह।उनकमयहभबकरनहहचकमममलवकवपब०णबलझ०-1, पब०णबलझ०-2, पब०णबलझ०-3, पब०णबलझ०-4, पब०णबलझ०-5 वपब०णबलझ०-6, पकदकहबहकरयवहह।सजससवसपषहकरहमहह चकआववदकचनदरषहहररमवहइसपकररममचद० 17.06.2020 सवकमरमरमरममचनरदहह। इससलएआववदकककजममनरपरछकडचदयमजमय।
पररवमदबकवचवदमनअसधवकमएवदचवदमनअपरशमसककयअसधवकमनवआववदककवजममनर कमपबलचवरकधकररवहहएरकरपसरमरचकयमचकआववदकदमरम कमरररअपरमधस द जवयएवद रदभबरपकमचरकमहह, इससलएआववदकककजममनरपरनछकडमजमय।
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
whether bail should be granted in the present criminal proceedings
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Sachin
Coram
Gautam Chowdhary
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · May
- Registered
- Case no.
- BAIL/51739/2022
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court