Dismissed
Vinod v. State of U.P.
Allahabad HCBAIL/51594/2019
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Bail application dismissed due to want of prosecution as the applicant did not appear despite peremptory listing for hearing, despite no response from counsels.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:145186
¶2
Court No. - 64
¶3
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 51594 of 2019
¶4
Applicant :- Vinod Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Raj Kumar Dhama Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Sanjay Dubey
¶5
Hon'ble Siddharth,J.
¶6
- List revised.
¶7
- This case is listed peremptorily today.
¶8
- No one responds on behalf of the applicant, like on earlier date fixed.
¶9
- It is not known whether the trial has been concluded or not. Whether the applicant has been charge-sheeted or exonerated.
¶10
- This bail application, is accordingly, dismissed for want of prosecution.
¶11
Order Date :- 20.7.2023 Abhishek
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- applicant
Vinod
Coram
AI extract
Siddharth
Abhishek
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · July
- Registered
- Case no.
- BAIL/51594/2019
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court