Held that the bail application is dismissed for lack of representation by the applicant despite the presence of opposing counsel and no appearance by the applicant in previous proceedings.
Bail application dismissed for non-appearance and non-prosecution of the matter by the applicant.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:142885
Court No. - 69
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 51477 of 2019
Applicant :- Yatendra Pratap Singh Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Rajneesh Tripathi,Dharm Raj Pal,Ghan Shyam Das,Rajrshi Gupta Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Samit Gopal,J.
(Samit Gopal,J.)
Order Date :- 18.7.2023 Naresh
Digitally signed by :- NARESH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 issue framed by the court
Whether bail should be granted in the absence of representation by the applicant.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Yatendra Pratap Singh
Samit Gopal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
