Sonu v. State of U.P.
Case brief
What is this about?
Single judge of Allahabad High Court disposed of a bail application held infructuous as the trial in the underlying matter was concluded. The applicant warrants had no objection. Application dismissed.
What the court decided
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:155084
Court No. - 70
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 5095 of 2019
Applicant :- Sonu Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Umesh Chandra Tiwari Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Sameer Jain,J.
Sri Umesh Chandra Tiwari, learned counsel for the applicant submitted that the instant matter may be dismissed as infructuous as trial of the case has already been concluded.
Learned AGA is having no objection to the same.
In view of the above, the instant bail application stands dismissed as infructuous .
Order Date :- 2.8.2023
Ankita
Digitally signed by :- ANKITA SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether bail application is maintainable when trial of the case has already been concluded.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Sonu
Coram
Samir Jain
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · August
- Registered
- Case no.
- BAIL/5095/2019
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court