The anticipatory bail application is dismissed for want of prosecution as neither the applicant nor their counsel appeared despite being called in the revised list.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:152004
Court No. - 73
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 50942 of 2019
Applicant :- Pramod Kumar Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Applicant :- Vinod Kumar Tirpathi,Manoj Kumar Tripathi Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Nalin Kumar Srivastava,J.
Order Date :- 28.7.2023 Shivangi
Digitally signed by :- SHIVANGI YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Pramod Kumar
State Of U.P.
Nalin Kumar Srivastava
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
