Dismissed

Mehfooj v. State of U.P.

Allahabad HC18 Sept 2023BAIL/50657/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In this anticipatory bail application under Section 438 Cr.P.C., the High Court held no case for interference. The application was disposed of directing the applicant to file a regular bail application and surrender within one month, referring to guidelines in Satender Kumar Antil.

What did the court decide?

Anticipatory bail application dismissed. Applicant directed to surrender within one month and file regular bail application.

Mehfooj Vs State of U.P. — Bail and Remand | Allahabad HC (2023)

¶1

Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:180053

¶2

Court No. - 72

¶3

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 50657 of 2019

¶4

Applicant :- Mehfooj Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Mukhtar Alam Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶5

Hon'ble Krishan Pahal,J.

¶6

List has been revised.

¶7

Heard Sri Mukhtar Alam, learned counsel for applicant as well as Sri R.P. Patel, learned Additional Government Advocate for State.

¶8

The present application for anticipatory bail has been filed for protection in regard to Case Crime No. 219 of 2019, under Section 306 I.P.C., Police Station- Ujhani, District- Budaun.

¶9

It is informant that the present anticipatory bail application has now become infructuous as the final report has been submitted.

¶10

After arguing for some time, applicant's counsel submits that the present application for anticipatory bail may be disposed of with a direction to file a regular bail application which may be decided keeping in view the guidelines as laid down by the Apex Court in the case of Satender Kumar Antil vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and another reported in 2022 SCC OnLine SC 825 .

¶11

Learned A.G.A. has no objection to the prayer of learned counsel for the applicant.

¶12

After hearing learned counsel for the parties, no case is made out for interference U/s 438 Cr.P.C. The present anticipatory bail application is disposed of with a direction that the applicant shall surrender before the concerned court below within one month from today and in case a regular bail application is filed, the same be decided in view of the law laid down by the Supreme Court in case of Satender Kumar Antil (supra) .

¶13

For the period of one month from today or till the time of surrender of the applicant before the concerned court below, whichever is earlier, no coercive action shall be taken against the applicant, in the above case crime.

¶14

Order Date :- 18.9.2023 Vikas

¶15

[Krishan Pahal, J.]

¶16

Digitally signed by :- VIKAS VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Mehfooj v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mehfooj v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Surendra Singh Vs State of U.P. and Another

Bhupendra Vs State of U.P. and Another

Pramod Chauhan Vs State of U.P. and Another

Rajesh Kumar Vs State of U.P.

Irfan Hussain and 2 Others Vs State of U.P and Another

Manish Vs State of U.P. and Another