Rizwan v. State of U.P.
Case brief
What is this about?
In this bail application, the applicant, Rizwan, alleged that prosecution witnesses gave false statements to procure his arrest. The court held that the presence of co-accused on bail and the absence of absurd prosecution witnesses negate the risk of inconclusive trial or tampering, thus granting bail.
What did the court decide?
Bail granted to the applicant with conditions to complete investigation, not to interfere with witnesses or leave India, and to surrender if summons are not sent.