Having heard the learned counsel for applicants, the learned A.G.A. for State, upon perusal of material brought on record, evidence, nature and gravity of offence as well as complicity of applicants, accusation made coupled with the fact that applicant was having enmity with the deceased and therefore, he has conspired in the commission of crime in question, complicity of applicant is established in the confessional statement of two other accused Monishkant and Gaurav Chaudhri, police report in terms of Section 173 (2) Cr.P.C. has already been submitted against applicants, as such, the entire evidence sought to be relied upon by prosecution against applicants stands crystalized, inspite of above, learned A.G.A. could not point out any such circumstance from the record necessitating custodial arrest of applicants during pendency of trial, the period of incarceration undergone, the clean antecedents of applicants, therefore, irrespective of the objections raised by the learned A.G.A. in opposition to the present application for bail, but without making any comment on the merits of the case, applicants have made out a case for bail.
