Tuntun Nath @ Pintu and Another Vs State of U.P.

Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:230892

Court No. - 74

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 48599 of 2023

Applicant :- Tuntun Nath @ Pintu And Another Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Vishal Jaiswal Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶5

Hon'ble Vivek Varma,J.

¶6

Heard learned counsel for the applicants as well as Sri V.P. Tripathi, learned A.G.A. for the State of U.P. and perused the record.

¶7

The instant bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C. has been filed with the prayer to enlarge the applicants on bail in Case Crime No.202 of 2023, under Section 3(1) of the U.P. Gangsters and Anti Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, Police Station Rawatpur, District Kanpur Nagar, during the pendency of the trial.

¶8

Learned counsel for the applicants submits that according to the gang chart, one case is shown against the applicants and in the said case the applicants have been enlarged on bail.

¶9

He further submits that in the F.I.R., in issue, the allegations with regard to disturbing the public order, as also regarding gaining undue temporal, pecuniary, material or other advantage of like nature against the applicants are vague. In absence of allegation concerning an act or omission on the part of an accused, covered by the definition of terms "gang" and "gangster" as provided under Section 2 of the Gangsters Act, no F.I.R. is maintainable. In the instant case, the F.I.R. is based upon solitary criminal case and not upon any new allegations or discovery of facts having serious reflection on the society, for which purpose the Gangsters Act was enacted.

¶10

It is also submitted that considering the facts of the case, as stated above, there are reasonable grounds for believing that the applicants are not guilty of the offence under the Gangsters Act and that they would not commit the offence while on bail nor would try to tamper the evidence or influence the witnesses in any manner whatsoever it may be. The applicants are in jail since 22.12.2022.

¶11

Learned A.G.A. has opposed the prayer for bail but could not

¶12

satisfactorily dispute the aforesaid submissions from the record.

¶13

Considering the rival submissions of learned counsel for parties, material available on record as well as taking note of Section 19(4) (b) of the Gangsters Act, in light of the submission of counsel for the applicants to the effect that while on bail in this case the applicants would not commit any crime/offence nor would try to tamper the evidence or influence the witnesses in any manner, whatsoever it may be, and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, I am of the view that the applicants are entitled to be released on bail. Accordingly, the bail application is allowed.

¶14

Let the applicants- Tuntun Nath @ Pintu and Arun , involved in the aforesaid case, be released on bail on their furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each of the like amount to the satisfaction of court concerned on the following conditions that:

¶15

(i) the applicants shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence;

¶16

(ii) the applicants shall not pressurize the prosecution witnesses; and,

¶17

(iii) the applicants shall appear on each and every date fixed by the trial court.

¶18

In case of breach of any of the above conditions, the prosecution shall be at liberty to move bail cancellation application before this Court.

¶19

Order Date :- 6.12.2023 S.S.

¶20

Digitally signed by :- SIDDHARTH SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Tuntun Nath @ Pintu and Another v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Tuntun Nath @ Pintu and Another v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Smt. Reeta Singh Vs State of U.P.

Salmaan Vs State of U.P.

Farahim Vs State of U.P.

Shivakant @ Ramu Vs State of U.P. and 3 Others

Nihal Singh @ Nihal Kumr Arya Vs State of U.P.

Ajay Dubey Vs State of U.P.