Allowed

Paras Nath v. State of U.P.

Allahabad HC9 Nov 2023BAIL/48423/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The applicant sought bail in a case under the U.P. Gangsters and Antisocial Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986. The High Court allowed bail, noting that the applicant was already on bail in the sole charge sheet case, and imposed conditions including personal bond and reliable sureties.

What did the court decide?

Release of the applicant on bail by furnishing a personal bond and two reliable sureties of Rs. 25,000/- each.

Paras Nath Vs State of U.P. — Bail and Remand | Allahabad HC (2023)

¶1

Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:216480

¶2

Court No. - 44

¶3

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 48423 of 2023

¶4

Applicant :- Paras Nath Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Krishna Mani Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶5

Hon'ble Pankaj Bhatia,J.

¶6

Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA and perused the record.

¶7

The applicant seeks bail in Case Crime No.30 of 2023 under section 3(1) U.P. Gangsters and Antisocial Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, P.S. Manchi, District Sonbhadra.

¶8

Learned counsel for the applicant has submitted that in the sole case shown in the gang chart, the applicant is on bail. The applicant is in jail since 31.07.2023. It has also been submitted that there is no possibility of the applicant's fleeing away from the judicial process or tampering with the witnesses. Learned counsel submits that in case the applicant released on bail, he will not misuse the liberty of bail and will cooperate in trial.

¶9

Learned AGA has opposed the prayer for bail but not contradicted the aforesaid fact.

¶10

Considering the fact that the applicant has been granted bail in the sole case shown against him, the applicant is entitled for the bail. Thus, the bail application is allowed.

¶11

Let the applicant Paras Nath be released on bail in aforesaid first information report number on his furnishing a personal bond and two reliable sureties of Rs.25000/- each with the following conditions:

¶12

(a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings;

¶13

(b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and

¶14

(c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence.

¶15

Order Date :- 9.11.2023 VNP/-

¶16

Digitally signed by :- VISHVANATH PRASAD SHUKLA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Paras Nath v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Paras Nath v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Nirmala Vs State of U.P. and 3 Others

Mudassir Vs State of U.P.

Durgesh @ Mata Vs State of U.P.

Gulfam Vs State of U.P.

Neelkamal @ Neetu and Another Vs State of U.P.

Prem Narayan Pandey Vs State of U.P.