The High Court granted bail to the applicant in a criminal trial case involving sections 323, 307, 341, 504, 506 IPC. The court noted no specific role for the applicant and allowed bail for parity with co-accused after five months of confinement.
The applicant was released on bail on a personal bond and two sureties subject to standard conditions.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:220443
Court No. - 74
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 47938 of 2023
Applicant :- Prabal Pratap @ Sonu Kumar Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Anand Pati Tiwari Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Shyam Babu Vaish,Sunil Kumar
Hon'ble Vivek Varma,J.
have opposed the prayer for bail but could not satisfactorily dispute the aforesaid submissions from the record.
(i) shall appear on the date fixed by the trial court;
(ii) shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence; and,
(iii) shall not pressurize the prosecution witnesses.
Order Date :- 20.11.2023 SKT/-
Digitally signed by :- SHIVA KANT TIWARI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the applicant is entitled to bail considering no specific role is assigned to him and co-accused have been granted bail.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Prabal Pratap
State of U.P.
Vivek Varma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
