Tutu v. State of U.P.
Case brief
What is this about?
In bail application under Sections 498-A and 304B IPC alleging dowry death, the High Court heard counsels and AGA. Finding no grounds for bail, application rejected and trial directed to conclude expeditiously within one year.
What the court decided
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:230881
Court No. - 64
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 47564 of 2023
Applicant :- Tutu Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Virendra Kumar Maurya,Ravi Sahu Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Siddharth,J.
Rejoinder afÏdavit filed by learned counsel for the applicant is taken on record.
Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as the learned AGA for the State and perused the material placed on record.
The instant bail application has been filed on behalf of the applicant, Tutu , with a prayer to release him on bail in Case Crime No. 76 of 2023, under Sections 498-A,304B IPC, and section 3/4 D.P. Act Police Station Kaushambi, DistrictGhaziabad, during pendency of trial.
There is allegation against the applicant of causing dowry death of his wife within seven months of her marriage.
Learned AGA has vehemently opposed the prayer for bail of the applicant.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the applicant is entitled to bail in the present circumstances.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Tutu
- respondent
State of U.P.
Coram
Siddharth
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · December
- Registered
- Case no.
- BAIL/47564/2023
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court