Single judge bail application where applicant opposed by the State was allowed based on arguments regarding non-confronting nature of the case and availability of comparable accommodation.
Application allowed. Impugned order set aside. Directions issued for grant of bail in terms of bail application.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:212361
Court No. - 68
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 47341 of 2023
Applicant :- Sandeep Kumar Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Applicant :- Ajay Pandey Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Dr. Gautam Chowdhary,J.
उपरसकशररसममसववकसदकवउलसघनकवमममलवमम, परदकरनयमयमलयआववदकककजममनर वनयममनकसमररदकरनवकससवरसतहह।
Order Date :- 6.11.2023/S.Mishra
Digitally signed by :- SHASHI MISHRA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the applicant satisfies the requirements of Section 437 of Cr.P.C. and Section 5(3) of the Bail Act, 2012 for granting bail.
Whether the bail application should be allowed given the availability of alternate accommodation and lack of prior criminal history.
Sandeep Kumar
Gautam Chowdhary
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
