Allowed

Prashsnt Choudhary @ Golu v. State of U.P.

Allahabad HC16 Dec 2023BAIL/46821/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Single Judge of Allahabad High Court granted bail to applicant Prashant Choudhary @ Golu in a criminal case involving explosion charges. The court relied on the grant of bail to another co-accused to order release on personal bond and two sureties.

What did the court decide?

Applicant released on bail on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each, subject to specific conditions and prohibits tampering or absence.

Prashsnt Choudhary @ Golu Vs State of U.P. — Bail and Remand | Allahabad HC (2023)

¶1

Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:238578

¶2

Court No. - 64

¶3

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 46821 of 2023

¶4

Applicant :- Prashant Choudhary @ Golu Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Km Preete Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶5

Hon'ble Siddharth,J.

¶6

List has been revised.

¶7

Heard Sri G.S. Chaturvedi, learned Senior Counsel assisted by Km. Preete, learned counsel for the applicant as well as the learned AGA for the State and perused the material placed on record.

¶8

The instant bail application has been filed on behalf of the applicant, Prashant Choudhary @ Golu, with a prayer to release him on bail in Case Crime No. 244 of 2023, under Sections 304, 268, 269, 285, 286 IPC and Section 3/5 of Explosive Substance Act and Section 2/3 U.P. Gangster And Anti Social Activities (Prevention) Act, Police Station Kotwali Nagar, District- Bulandshahar, during pendency of trial.

¶9

Learned counsel for the applicant has contended that the co-accused, Pramod Kumar Vaidh, has been granted bail by this Court today in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No.50595 of 2023. The case of the applicant stands on identical footing, hence the applicant is also entitled for bail on the ground of parity for the reasons given in bail application of co-accused. The applicant is languishing in jail since 3.4.2023.

¶10

Learned AGA has opposed the prayer for bail, but does not dispute the claim of parity.

¶11

Let the applicant involved in aforesaid case be released on bail on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions which are being imposed in the interest of justice:-

¶12

(i) The applicant shall not tamper with the evidence or threaten the witnesses.

¶13

(ii) The applicant shall file an undertaking to the effect that he shall not seek any adjournment on the dates fixed for evidence when the witnesses are present in Court. In case of default of this condition, it shall be open for the Trial Court to treat it as abuse of liberty of bail and pass orders in accordance with law.

¶14

(iii) The applicant shall remain present before the Trial Court on each

¶15

date fixed, either personally or as directed by the Court. In case of his absence, without sufficient cause, the Trial Court may proceed against him under Section 229-A of the Indian Penal Code.

¶16

(iv) In case the applicant misuse the liberty of bail during trial and in order to secure his presence, proclamation under Section 82 Cr.P.C. is issued and the applicants fail to appear before the Court on the date fixed in such proclamation then the Trial Court shall initiate proceedings against him in accordance with law under Section 174-A of the Indian Penal Code.

¶17

(v) The applicant shall remain present in person before the Trial Court on the dates fixed for (i) opening of the case, (ii) framing of charge and (iii) recording of statement under Section 313 Cr.P.C. If in the opinion of the Trial Court absence of the applicant is deliberate or without sufficient cause, then it shall be open for the Trial Court to treat such default as abuse of liberty of bail and proceed against him in accordance with law.

¶18

In case of breach of any of the above conditions, it shall be a ground for cancellation of bail.

¶19

Identity and residence proof of the applicant and sureties be verified by the court concerned before the bonds are accepted.

¶20

Order Date :- 16.12.2023 Ruchi Agrahari

¶21

Digitally signed by :- RUCHI AGRAHARI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Prashsnt Choudhary @ Golu v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Prashsnt Choudhary @ Golu v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rajkumar Banwasi @ Tunnu Vs State of U.P.

Yameen Vs State of U.P.

Parvez Ansari Vs State of U.P.

Pankaj Vs State of U.P.

Arvind Kumar Vs State of U.P. and 3 Others

Pramod Kumar Vaidh Vs State of U.P.