In a bail application, the High Court granted relief to the applicant, noting prolonged jail term and co-accused bail, finding no reasonable apprehension of evidence tampering despite charges including cheating and intimidation.
Released on bail by personal bond and two sureties subject to conditions not to tamper with evidence or pressurize witnesses.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:231811
Court No. - 75
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 46365 of 2023
Applicant :- Deepak Shivhare Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Pawan Giri,Himanshu Goswami,Shivam Verma
Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Umesh Chandra Sharma,J.
1.Counter affidavit and rejoinder affidavit filed today are taken on record.
(i) shall appear on the date fixed by the trial court; (ii) shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence; (iii) shall not pressurize the prosecution witnesses.
Order Date :- 7.12.2023 S.Verma
Digitally signed by :- SANDEEP KUMAR VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the applicant is entitled to bail under Section 439 Cr.P.C. given prolonged incarceration and lack of apprehension of tampering with evidence.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Deepak Shivhare
State of U.P.
Umesh Chandra Sharma
Sandeep Kumar Verma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
